about | join |
login
50%
That does beg the question. I suspect it would hinge on what volume one considered "the same as it's size." It could be that the cartographers simply realized you can never talk about the US enough. ;)
replied 8 months ago50% match | 1 jaa | reply )
50%
Well, they could have taken the approach that the quantity of references exactly matches the size of the world and then went from there. Countries would be the size proportionally of their reference counts.
replied 8 months ago50% match | 1 jaa | reply )

about | blog | faq | privacy

© 2008 jaanix, inc.